Paul Brancato

What exactly did Tucker Carlson say about a possible assassination of Donald Trump? Why do you think it relevant?

I hear you. Crafard is certainly a person of interest. The reason I say that is because Crafard got out of town. And I think your hint that it might have to do with the murder of Tippit is most interesting. The story Estes told doesn’t lead anywhere by itself. It’s only because it was in the Carousel that it takes on meaning. Connolly may have been there, may have taken money. It doesn’t lead anywhere by itself. But Crafard? Way too little attention has been given to him. He is a mystery man. What were his connections? Btw, can you fill us in of Crafard later on? Did he resurface? I might have missed it if you already explored that.

Matthew - rather than pile on you on another post where you are taking some heat, I’m coming back to this one in hopes that you respond. I’ve read deeply, way beyond the clips you posted. I haven’t seen anything Boneface McLellan has said that leads me to believe he was at Jan 6, much less working for the CIA or FBI if he was. However, there was another Ukrainian Nazi, pictured in your post, who was at Jan 6th. Did you mean to imply that he was one and the same with McLellan, or just that by conflating a brief clip of McLellan saying the CIA sent him to Azov with the more recent photo from Jan 6th you proved your point? If I’m reading this correctly it was the latter. Well, the way I read it is that McLellan claimed around 2014 during the Maidan coup that he was sent by CIA. He also went to Ukraine in 2022, but I don’t think this clip refers to his recent sojourn, rather his first one. What do you think?

What thugs has Newman identified?

Matthew - first, I’d like to say that this post doesn’t belong here. It looks to me like you are taunting Robert. I spent some time looking at these videos by Ms Loomer, and then more time looking at her history. Do you think she is a trusted news source? The videos are interesting, but there is a lack of continuity and depth here. Who is ‘Boneface’? Why don’t you take a moment and in your own words say what you think is significant about this revelation? Are you trying to say that you believe that the Jan 6th event was staged by Biden supporters, including neo-Nazis who Biden is knowingly sending to Ukraine to join with the Azov battalion? I prefer a little straight talk on subjects like this which are so inflammatory. What exactly is your belief?

And Licio Gelli attended Reagan’s inauguration. There is also the curious story told by Colonel Brandstetter, long time asset of US Army Intelligence living in Acapulco. Around the time that Gelli was evading Italian Justice Brandstetter was asked to find housing for someone that included coastal access and secret tunnel access along the shoreline. He later was told to forget it, but by then he had found both an appropriate piece of real estate and had figure out who the mystery purchaser was - Licio Gelli, in this case being aided in his search by unnamed US military figures.

Mr. Josephs, and Jim D, have this right. Ben - you try to explain that the CIA might have gotten rid of pics of the real LHO to obscure their own role in a MC op. But his presence in MC visiting embassies was an essential part of their plan to se up a pro-Communist patsy. Seriously, by far the best explanation for the lack of photo evidence is that there never was any such evidence. I think Pat Speer came up with a nice middle position. The lack of photo evidences at the embassies means that he wasn’t there. But it doesn’t mean he wasn’t in MC doing something. That question, and his means of transportation if he was there, remains open. So it’s worth looking at separate evidence of his presence, as weird as some of it is, such as the twist party and observations of his presence along with so far unidentified other persons. I’m not saying I believe he was there, and there is reason to think some of this was fabricated also. But at least it’s an open question, whereas his presence at the embassies should be put to rest. I read the report of the Russian operatives who say he was there. They sound very convincing, Ben, for sure. But they must have been fabricating the whole thing for other reasons, because there is no photo evidence, and that is crucial. No, it makes no sense that the CIA would destroy photo evidence, because it ran counter to their aims. If the Russians say otherwise, where is their proof? People can say anything.

Maybe so - I started it, and wouldn’t object to it being moved. But I don’t particularly mind reading posts here.

For me it is truly ‘both and ‘. He made very useful observations about power, while making sure not to go so far as to violate any particular non disclosure agreements, which he surely had. There is, as Ben points out, a very similar dynamic being used against RFK2. Does going on Fox repeatedly, or doing multiple interviews with Tucker Carlson, or participating in events with fringe elements that he surely disagrees with, imply an endorsement of their ideas? I wish Robert would stay here, but I understand his frustration. He will continue his penetrating research, and I will continue to converse with him about it. I’ve learned a lot from doing so.

You talking to me? I’m one of the few here who have read what you’ve written and interacted with you, not just this sojourn here but past ones too. Of course your pov has morphed. But whatever it is at the moment, with you it’s always the right one. You don’t play well with others.

Heh heh. Prouty directly addressed the Liberty Lobby issue, as quoted by Jeff Carter. meanwhile, Mervyn would like to be a cult leader. Maybe he could publish his works like James has. Jeff - isn’t there one unaddressed issue about Prouty regarding his sharing of what he saw from his lofty insider perch? I’m not dismissing his general views, just wondering what more he knew that he didn’t reveal.

More info on Mataxis Leslie?

There was also a movie planned.

McCloy?

Indeed. So Mr. Backes thought that Newman said that?

Seems to me the book has been in the works for years. I had an interaction with Mr. Jaffe when he was posting here in which his response to my question about who in French Intelligence was sharing info with him when Garrison sent him to France to research was ‘wait for the book’. That was literally years ago. Last time I sent him a message about when we would see the book I received no response. I agree with you that it would be of great interest. Did you see something indicating it was coming out soon?

Sorry my friend

And Solie above Angleton?

Did you read it?

I like this post Richard. I don’t buy your pet two Cubans theory, but the rest of it is spot on.

Isn’t it possible that McCord, and for that matter Solie, were acting as Soviet agents but at the behest of Angleton? Triple agents? Maybe there was no mole in the CIA, but it was useful for the CIA to let the Soviets think they were hunting for one. Robert isn’t posting - maybe he’s been kicked off again. Jim Asked him a question about Nosenko. After several years of torture by Angleton, Nosenko was cleared by the CIA. Meanwhile, Golitsyn was Angleton’s buddy, along with DiVosjoli. Pete Bagley as a trusted source? No way. Of course I think it’s fine to interview him or anyone else, but that’s not the question. I don’t hear Newman saying he was giving Bagley an ear, I’m hearing that he believed him. Meanwhile, no one, maybe not Newman, nor anyone else here (Jim D?) has read The Spy Who Would Be Tsar by Kevin Coogan. It’s available on Kindle. I’m reading it, and yes it’s a difficult read. So is Newman. Of course I will give Newman a fair hearing no matter what my impressions are of Nosenko/Golitsyn. Another book that I wish was on everyone’s radar is Secret War Against the Jews by John Loftus. Has anyone read about Kim Philby’s father? This is the book for you if you haven’t. It’s not difficult, and eye opening. Pondering Kim Philby and the Cambridge 5 made me look into Anthony Blunt, ostensibly one of them but he never left England. He came clean, was stripped of his titles but never jailed or excommunicated. In essence, he admitted to helping the Soviet Union during WW 2 because - hold on - the Nazi sympathizers in the British government were holding back info on German troop movements on the Eastern Front because they were siding with Hitler. It doesn’t take a genius to figure out that Harriman, Prescott Bush, Allen Dulles, John J McCloy were conflicted in the same way. They had enormous financial interests in Germany which they sought to protect. After the war they took hold of American foreign policy, rebuilt Germany, barely punished the Nazis (compared to the USSR which put thousands of them to death) and went to war against the USSR. JFK tried to stop this. He failed.

Ditto

Mr. Metta, who wrote the recent book following up on Garrison’s investigation of Permindex, quotes an article in which an Italian journalist interviews Colonel Prouty. The Colonel never flat out says that Harriman was the puppet master behind the JFK assassination, but he does name him, and Prescott Bush, and Allen Dulles, Schroeder bank, calls the cabal something like supranational. He never mentions heroin, but the nice thing about your theory is that the military industrial complex and the worldwide drug trade both depend on the US Military and the CIA.

you have mentioned Weaver’s book before and left a review of it on Amazon in 2017. I tried to find a copy but as you noted it was very expensive if available at all. You didn’t mention your copy of his notes in the review, and I’ll presume you got them later. It would be nice if you made them available to researchers.