-
Posts
3,622 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Everything posted by David G. Healy
-
JIm Leavelle interviewed by William Matson Law
David G. Healy replied to a topic in JFK Assassination Debate
After 50+ years, the Dallas PD is still trying to close the LHO/SBT deal! Leavelle might have been good witness against Ruby (for the prosecution) 50 years ago, but not against Oswald. I suspect he'd of been chewed up by a Mark Lane type... -
I'd be remiss if I didn't post this very short overview concerning the BYPhotos. The possible alteration study was performed by Jack White many years ago. aside: even LHO said the BYP was a fake. follow the link below: https://newsblaze.com/usnews/national/the-backyard-photos-of-lee-harvey-oswald-are-fakes_9208/
-
Trying to Understand this Bronson Frame
David G. Healy replied to John Butler's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
let me be blunt: if David Joseph's is posting I want to read it. -
Will Fritz that Masterful Detective
David G. Healy replied to James DiEugenio's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
actually I believe it was the Dallas PD that brought it into the TSBD and actually made it, thanks for reminding us... So, ya can't get Oswald in that 6th floor window at 1230hrs 11/22/63, the alleged in-camera Zapruder film appears to have been altered, ya can't ID the murder rifle, the DPD did not check to see if the MC rifle had been fired recently, you're using Tippit murder as a diversionary pawn and we can go on and on. Is it any wonder Mark Lane blew the 1964 WCR conclusions into the next world? Great case DVP, got be worth another 10 websites, right? The stench is mighty high, Sherlock... -
Will Fritz that Masterful Detective
David G. Healy replied to James DiEugenio's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
even you DVP can't hide from the stench. -
Trying to Understand this Bronson Frame
David G. Healy replied to John Butler's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
you are right, David. I needed to check my DP eye witness position chart. No real fascination, just advancing age telling me there was something there that shouldn't be, aka someone out of position (that wasn't). -
Trying to Understand this Bronson Frame
David G. Healy replied to John Butler's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
well now, that is certainly fascinating... -
Logic seems to suggest...
David G. Healy replied to Denny Zartman's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Here's a yardstick for ya, fantastic claims require fantastic evidence.... What DIA files? Cite please. And "According to records..." What records? -
Thursday at Ruth Paines House
David G. Healy replied to Derek Thibeault's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
glad you brought that up. It's long been my intention to point out that "in the real world," its a prime loon nut tactic of deception re "diving deep" into ANYTHING concerning this murder. An exercise of futility and diversion! You're welcome, Dave. Anything to help drive traffic to your 25 websites, 140 blogs, 3 youtube channels and your 1.437,296 posts to JFK assassination murder USENET boards? -
Thursday at Ruth Paines House
David G. Healy replied to Derek Thibeault's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
we got 24+ volumes Davey. We got lies for the millennium... -
they (edge markings and mfg' symbols) could have been added to a new in-camera Z-film master at a later date, Gene. And Roland knew that immediately after he told me. Stone cold silence... And I too think the Z-film controversy is a major league shuck and jive lone nut diversion. The medical evidence sinks the 1964 WCR as far as I'm concerned...
-
Thursday at Ruth Paines House
David G. Healy replied to Derek Thibeault's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
sandblasted, eh? He was blinded during that accident, or was that event something he missed by, say 3 and half blocks? a lot of things changed after 11/22/63 all to the WCR favor.... It smells like a duck, Dave, NOT chicken! -
Thursday at Ruth Paines House
David G. Healy replied to Derek Thibeault's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
indeed he is... and he doesn't like being called to these forums either. But duty calls. The nutters are getting creamed every where. Re: the paper sack? Perhaps they hadn't made ups their minds yet as to whether or not Oswald ordered a 36" MC carbine or the 40" MC long rifle? How is that for a bit of controversy? -
Thursday at Ruth Paines House
David G. Healy replied to Derek Thibeault's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
how was Brennan's eyesight again? -
Thursday at Ruth Paines House
David G. Healy replied to Derek Thibeault's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
amazing what you CAN'T find on DVP's web of "info." -
Vietnam Declassified: Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon
David G. Healy replied to James DiEugenio's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Excellent work, Jim. DHealy -
Nope, wasn't I. Although I'm not the least bit surprised. It's been 10 years to boot. If I recall correctly, this was around the 5/2008 time Rollie Zavada had agreed to debate the merits of film alteration. Right here on the Ed Forum... He was, then he wasn't Rollie was. Then Gary Mack's and Josiah Thompsons' Gang of 8 was all over that like stink on do-do. What a cluster...
-
The Tippit Case in the New Millenium
David G. Healy replied to James DiEugenio's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
.john tells him so? -
the Gale link is not working at this time.
-
Focus your research on Zapruder, he is the key
David G. Healy replied to Mike Rago's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Trygve, You have not offended this David, and your posts are NOT incoherent. Keep up your photo work. I know all about JFK film-photo analysis critiques/criticism... Have a well deserved rest. p.s. you do contribute! -
Focus your research on Zapruder, he is the key
David G. Healy replied to Mike Rago's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Here's your problem, you can't prove any of the claims you make in this thread. Nothing is impossible in Hollyweird when it comes to film composition and individual artistic work applied to film composites, PERIOD. So for THAT "zero evidence" to become reality/happen, you need access to the in-camera original NIX film, and that has disappeared! Gone, POOF! And, as old Gary Mack once told me, "the Zapruder film will never, ever see the inside of a courtroom, nor will it be laced up in a projector, EVER!" So let's table the marketing message(s), Watson. Oh, and scratch access to the Zapruder in-camera original film, NARA has ceased visitations and/or access to same film...