David G. Healy

After 50+ years, the Dallas PD is still trying to close the LHO/SBT deal! Leavelle might have been good witness against Ruby (for the prosecution) 50 years ago, but not against Oswald. I suspect he'd of been chewed up by a Mark Lane type...

I'd be remiss if I didn't post this very short overview concerning the BYPhotos. The possible alteration study was performed by Jack White many years ago. aside: even LHO said the BYP was a fake. follow the link below: https://newsblaze.com/usnews/national/the-backyard-photos-of-lee-harvey-oswald-are-fakes_9208/

let me be blunt: if David Joseph's is posting I want to read it.

actually I believe it was the Dallas PD that brought it into the TSBD and actually made it, thanks for reminding us... So, ya can't get Oswald in that 6th floor window at 1230hrs 11/22/63, the alleged in-camera Zapruder film appears to have been altered, ya can't ID the murder rifle, the DPD did not check to see if the MC rifle had been fired recently, you're using Tippit murder as a diversionary pawn and we can go on and on. Is it any wonder Mark Lane blew the 1964 WCR conclusions into the next world? Great case DVP, got be worth another 10 websites, right? The stench is mighty high, Sherlock...

even you DVP can't hide from the stench.

WCR lone nuts knew the SBT was thin at best, they needed some diversion, anything to take the focus off of Elm St. events. Enter Dale "wanna see my EMMY" Myers. DVP is one of Myers biggest cheerleaders.

you are right, David. I needed to check my DP eye witness position chart. No real fascination, just advancing age telling me there was something there that shouldn't be, aka someone out of position (that wasn't).

well now, that is certainly fascinating...

Here's a yardstick for ya, fantastic claims require fantastic evidence.... What DIA files? Cite please. And "According to records..." What records?

glad you brought that up. It's long been my intention to point out that "in the real world," its a prime loon nut tactic of deception re "diving deep" into ANYTHING concerning this murder. An exercise of futility and diversion! You're welcome, Dave. Anything to help drive traffic to your 25 websites, 140 blogs, 3 youtube channels and your 1.437,296 posts to JFK assassination murder USENET boards?

we got 24+ volumes Davey. We got lies for the millennium...

they (edge markings and mfg' symbols) could have been added to a new in-camera Z-film master at a later date, Gene. And Roland knew that immediately after he told me. Stone cold silence... And I too think the Z-film controversy is a major league shuck and jive lone nut diversion. The medical evidence sinks the 1964 WCR as far as I'm concerned...

sandblasted, eh? He was blinded during that accident, or was that event something he missed by, say 3 and half blocks? a lot of things changed after 11/22/63 all to the WCR favor.... It smells like a duck, Dave, NOT chicken!

indeed he is... and he doesn't like being called to these forums either. But duty calls. The nutters are getting creamed every where. Re: the paper sack? Perhaps they hadn't made ups their minds yet as to whether or not Oswald ordered a 36" MC carbine or the 40" MC long rifle? How is that for a bit of controversy?

how was Brennan's eyesight again?

I asked Roland Zavada way back when (2003-04?), if, KODAK double 8mm film stock, like the same film stock as the Z-film 'could' of been manufactured without edge markings and manufacturing ID symbols. His answer shocked me, he said, yes. Take that where ever you want...

amazing what you CAN'T find on DVP's web of "info."

Excellent work, Jim. DHealy

Imagine that... US taxpayers paid the Zapruder family millions of $'s for the alleged in-camera original film, currently under the auspices of the 6th Floor Mausoleum. And we can't see it. More loon nut nonsense...

hear-hear!

Nope, wasn't I. Although I'm not the least bit surprised. It's been 10 years to boot. If I recall correctly, this was around the 5/2008 time Rollie Zavada had agreed to debate the merits of film alteration. Right here on the Ed Forum... He was, then he wasn't Rollie was. Then Gary Mack's and Josiah Thompsons' Gang of 8 was all over that like stink on do-do. What a cluster...

.john tells him so?

the Gale link is not working at this time.

Trygve, You have not offended this David, and your posts are NOT incoherent. Keep up your photo work. I know all about JFK film-photo analysis critiques/criticism... Have a well deserved rest. p.s. you do contribute!

Here's your problem, you can't prove any of the claims you make in this thread. Nothing is impossible in Hollyweird when it comes to film composition and individual artistic work applied to film composites, PERIOD. So for THAT "zero evidence" to become reality/happen, you need access to the in-camera original NIX film, and that has disappeared! Gone, POOF! And, as old Gary Mack once told me, "the Zapruder film will never, ever see the inside of a courtroom, nor will it be laced up in a projector, EVER!" So let's table the marketing message(s), Watson. Oh, and scratch access to the Zapruder in-camera original film, NARA has ceased visitations and/or access to same film...