John Butler Posted November 19, 2021 Share Posted November 19, 2021 (edited) Oswald was right when he said "that is not even my face". Can you see the differences? I see several things right off. 1. The hair pattern is different. BYP Oswald has less hair and of a different color. 2. The eyes and eyebrows are not the same 3. The ears are not the same. BYP Oswald has bigger ears. Measure them in relation to the eyes and mouth. BYP Oswald lacks the distinctive pattern of the left ear of Dallas DPD Oswald. 4. The chin is not the same. BYP Oswald's chin is broader. You can talk all you want about camera angles. It is just so much background noise to me. Oswald says "that just a fake". He talks about someone superimposing his face on the photo. And, that is just standard photo altering technique. A lot of photos of Oswald are done that way. Edited November 19, 2021 by John Butler Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
W. Tracy Parnell Posted November 19, 2021 Share Posted November 19, 2021 Handy index to criticisms of the Stone film: Oliver Stone's JFK Revisited ~ W. Tracy Parnell (wtracyparnell.blogspot.com) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James DiEugenio Posted November 19, 2021 Share Posted November 19, 2021 The two points we brought up in the film are valid issues. And they counter the HSCA and Farid. Greg Parker has even more coming out on this later. But as for the rifle itself, we actually held back some of our best evidence on that. Its amazing to me how many first and second generation critics refused to touch that topic. And I'm glad Oliver included that clip of Marina standing up to Brokaw. We go even more into the media issue in the long version. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michaleen Kilroy Posted November 19, 2021 Share Posted November 19, 2021 (edited) 20 hours ago, James DiEugenio said: Edited November 19, 2021 by Michaleen Kilroy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michaleen Kilroy Posted November 19, 2021 Share Posted November 19, 2021 (edited) Saw this today on Twitter: I hope the documentary has a good PR person/firm promoting it. There’s almost too much here for great story angles/pitches. As a PR guy, I always thought the JFK research community suffered from the lack of a cohesive PR strategy and implementation. JFK Revisited deserves its due in the media. Edited November 19, 2021 by Michaleen Kilroy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff Carter Posted November 19, 2021 Share Posted November 19, 2021 Obviously Mr Litwin is this go-round’s designated Posner / Bugliosi. It’s amusing that the effort stumbled out of the gate producing/sponsoring books on the assumption the new Stone film would be focussed largely on Garrison/Shaw/New Orleans… whoops. Just to note, his claim the backyard photos were “conclusively” proven legitimate is completely incorrect. The HSCA, like the FBI before it, acknowledged that the technical possibility of a facial replacement at the chin line could not be proved or disproved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James DiEugenio Posted November 20, 2021 Share Posted November 20, 2021 Thanks for that Jeff. I have sworn off Litwin. Also Mike, we have a good nationally known PR firm for the film. So it will be getting some attention. I am doing a national show in Australia next week, I think on Wednesday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michaleen Kilroy Posted November 20, 2021 Share Posted November 20, 2021 22 minutes ago, James DiEugenio said: Thanks for that Jeff. I have sworn off Litwin. Also Mike, we have a good nationally known PR firm for the film. So it will be getting some attention. I am doing a national show in Australia next week, I think on Wednesday. Good to hear, Jim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James DiEugenio Posted November 20, 2021 Share Posted November 20, 2021 Tomorrow night at 6pm PCT, Lisa Pease, the producer Rob Wilson, and myself will be on a Twitter feed. I announced it already at Twitter just go there for the info. Should be interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James DiEugenio Posted November 20, 2021 Share Posted November 20, 2021 On Sunday, i will be taping my CAPA presentation live. Which will be on the making of the film. And I will do an hour long Q and A. That night I will be doing Richard Syrett's Zoomer radio show out of Toronto, AM 740, 11PM to 1 Am EST. That is a 50,000 watt station. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James DiEugenio Posted November 20, 2021 Share Posted November 20, 2021 (edited) Jeff Beal's music, Paul B can now judge for himself. https://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B09LM5K15G/filmmusicsear-20 I mean really, Beal, Sutherland, Goldberg, Richardson.... Talk about top of the line. Edited November 20, 2021 by James DiEugenio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin Cole Posted November 20, 2021 Share Posted November 20, 2021 6 hours ago, Michaleen Kilroy said: Saw this today on Twitter: I hope the documentary has a good PR person/firm promoting it. There’s almost too much here for great story angles/pitches. As a PR guy, I always thought the JFK research community suffered from the lack of a cohesive PR strategy and implementation. JFK Revisited deserves its due in the media. Michaleen-- You are so right. There are a few simple, indisputable story lines regarding the JFKA, such as the timing of shots hitting JFK, JBC, and then JFK, and that LHO was said to have a single-shot bolt-action rifle. Here is JBC before the HSCA: "Connally: I was knocked over, just doubled over by the force of the bullet. It went in my back and came out my chest about 2 inches below and the left of my right nipple. The force of the bullet drove my body over almost double and when I looked, immediately I could see I was just drenched with blood. (1 HSCA 42)" ---30--- OK, sure, witness testimony can be garbled, biased, inconsistent. But I think we can trust JBC on his reaction to getting shot, especially when it is consistent with the Z film. Obviously JBC was not shot with the same bullet that caused JFK to hold his hands to his throat. That said, Stone and DuEugenio's latest film is a triumph, towering above my quibbles. I do wish the duo had led the film with the least controversial aspects of the JFKA---the timing of shots---and built a platform from that. But it is always this way---when one or searching for or advocating the truth, the complicated details get messy, and even worse, some biased figures will introduce false details, or ad hominem attacks. You get into the weeds at great peril, whether the topic is the JFKA, the Bay of Pigs, the Afghanistan war, or 1/6. Most people want comforting narratives. It takes some double-skillful PR to tell detailed truths, and not get derailed! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James DiEugenio Posted November 20, 2021 Share Posted November 20, 2021 Thanks for that Ben. We were lucky to have some really skillful people help us. Oliver will have a couple of things coming out on Monday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anthony Thorne Posted November 20, 2021 Share Posted November 20, 2021 (edited) Jim, if you have details of the Aussie show (date or channel or what show it will be) once they can be shared, please do. Some friends and I down here in Melbourne will keep an eye out. Edited November 20, 2021 by Anthony Thorne Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James DiEugenio Posted November 20, 2021 Share Posted November 20, 2021 Anthony: Its called Today Extra, and its one of those morning chat shows, its on Chanel 9. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now